import type { ComparisonPage } from "@/lib/pseo-page-types";

export const comparisonPages: ComparisonPage[] = [
  {
    slug: "beaconstac-alternative",
    title: "Beaconstac Alternative for SMB QR Campaigns",
    description:
      "Compare QR Master vs Beaconstac for dynamic QR campaigns, analytics depth, GDPR posture, and bulk workflows.",
    canonicalPath: "/compare/beaconstac-alternative",
    targetKeyword: "beaconstac alternative",
    comparisonType: "alternative",
    intentStage: "bottom",
    cluster: "comparison",
    primaryEntity: "QR Master",
    secondaryEntity: "Beaconstac",
    intro:
      "Teams looking for a Beaconstac alternative usually need dynamic QR management without enterprise-level overhead.",
    quickAnswer:
      "QR Master is the better fit for SMB teams that need dynamic QR codes, analytics, and privacy-first workflows without paying for heavyweight enterprise packaging.",
    scorecard: [
      {
        topic: "Best fit",
        qrMaster: "SMB teams, agencies, restaurants, and packaging workflows",
        alternative: "Larger teams with enterprise procurement and broader governance needs",
      },
      {
        topic: "Bulk creation",
        qrMaster: "CSV and Excel-friendly workflows aligned to up to 1,000-code batches",
        alternative: "Enterprise-oriented batch operations with broader platform complexity",
      },
      {
        topic: "Privacy angle",
        qrMaster: "GDPR-friendly positioning with hashed IP approach",
        alternative: "Broader enterprise feature set, less differentiated privacy story",
      },
    ],
    decisionPoints: [
      {
        label: "You want faster time-to-value for printed campaigns",
        winner: "qr-master",
        reason: "The product story is tighter around trackable QR workflows instead of broader enterprise tooling.",
      },
      {
        label: "You need a heavier enterprise feature envelope",
        winner: "alternative",
        reason: "Beaconstac is more likely to win when procurement and enterprise policy are the main buying forces.",
      },
      {
        label: "You care most about analytics, editability, and reprint savings",
        winner: "qr-master",
        reason: "Those jobs map directly to QR Master's strongest product narrative.",
      },
    ],
    bestForQrMaster: [
      "Restaurants and retail teams managing changing print assets",
      "Marketers who need dynamic edits after print without bloated setup",
      "SMB operations that value GDPR-ready messaging",
    ],
    bestForAlternative: [
      "Enterprise buyers with more complex governance requirements",
      "Organizations already centered on a larger enterprise QR procurement process",
    ],
    migrationSteps: [
      "Audit your current dynamic QR inventory and identify live campaign codes.",
      "Recreate high-priority codes in QR Master with clearer naming and campaign grouping.",
      "Move printed campaigns first, then analytics and tracking conventions.",
    ],
    faq: [
      {
        question: "Why compare QR Master to Beaconstac?",
        answer: "Because both address dynamic QR management, but they are aimed at different levels of complexity and team size.",
      },
      {
        question: "When is Beaconstac still the better fit?",
        answer: "When enterprise procurement, policy requirements, or broader enterprise platform expectations outweigh speed and focus.",
      },
      {
        question: "What is QR Master's strongest advantage in this comparison?",
        answer: "A tighter SMB-focused product story around dynamic updates, analytics, bulk generation, and privacy-first positioning.",
      },
    ],
    primaryCta: {
      href: "/dynamic-qr-code-generator",
      label: "Try QR Master",
    },
    secondaryCta: {
      href: "/pricing",
      label: "Compare pricing",
    },
    relatedLinks: [
      {
        href: "/compare/flowcode-alternative",
        title: "Flowcode Alternative",
        description: "Compare another popular business QR option against QR Master.",
      },
      {
        href: "/compare/free-vs-paid-qr-code-generator",
        title: "Free vs Paid QR Generator",
        description: "Useful when the buying question is really about upgrade timing and control.",
      },
      {
        href: "/bulk-qr-code-generator",
        title: "Bulk QR Code Generator",
        description: "Commercial page for bulk and repeatable QR workflows.",
      },
    ],
  },
  {
    slug: "flowcode-alternative",
    title: "Flowcode Alternative for Trackable QR Campaigns",
    description:
      "Compare QR Master vs Flowcode for scan tracking, campaign workflows, branded QR management, and post-print edits.",
    canonicalPath: "/compare/flowcode-alternative",
    targetKeyword: "flowcode alternative",
    comparisonType: "alternative",
    intentStage: "bottom",
    cluster: "comparison",
    primaryEntity: "QR Master",
    secondaryEntity: "Flowcode",
    intro:
      "Flowcode alternative searches usually come from teams that want the same business outcome with better fit, pricing logic, or workflow clarity.",
    quickAnswer:
      "QR Master is the better fit when your decision is driven by dynamic updates, practical campaign analytics, and operational QR workflows rather than a more brand-heavy QR buying experience.",
    scorecard: [
      {
        topic: "Core promise",
        qrMaster: "Editable QR destinations, analytics, bulk workflows, and privacy-first positioning",
        alternative: "Strong brand-led QR story with campaign-friendly positioning",
      },
      {
        topic: "Operational workflows",
        qrMaster: "Clear fit for menus, packaging, events, and bulk creation",
        alternative: "Better known in brand and creator-led QR use cases",
      },
      {
        topic: "Conversion story",
        qrMaster: "Focused on measurable post-print outcomes",
        alternative: "Focused on broader campaign and brand use cases",
      },
    ],
    decisionPoints: [
      {
        label: "You need operational QR workflows tied to offline surfaces",
        winner: "qr-master",
        reason: "The product narrative maps directly to editable, measurable print workflows.",
      },
      {
        label: "You care most about a brand-led buying story",
        winner: "alternative",
        reason: "Flowcode's market perception is stronger in some brand-centric buying contexts.",
      },
      {
        label: "You want a practical SMB-oriented campaign stack",
        winner: "qr-master",
        reason: "QR Master's positioning is tighter around measurable business use cases.",
      },
    ],
    bestForQrMaster: [
      "Restaurants, retail, and operations-heavy QR use cases",
      "Teams that want campaign tracking without enterprise overhead",
      "Businesses that value GDPR-friendly language in the sales motion",
    ],
    bestForAlternative: [
      "Teams prioritizing a more established brand in the QR category",
      "Campaigns where brand familiarity matters more than workflow specificity",
    ],
    migrationSteps: [
      "Group existing Flowcode use cases by campaign, industry, or printed surface.",
      "Move the highest-converting dynamic QR destinations first.",
      "Use QR Master naming and CTA structure to standardize future campaigns.",
    ],
    faq: [
      {
        question: "What makes someone search for a Flowcode alternative?",
        answer: "Usually price, workflow fit, analytics expectations, or a need for a tighter operational QR product than a broad brand-led option.",
      },
      {
        question: "Which product is better for measurable print campaigns?",
        answer: "QR Master is the better fit when the priority is dynamic updates, tracking, and operational clarity after assets are printed.",
      },
      {
        question: "Can both tools handle dynamic QR codes?",
        answer: "Yes, but the differentiation is in workflow focus, analytics framing, and the broader product story.",
      },
    ],
    primaryCta: {
      href: "/qr-code-tracking",
      label: "See tracking features",
    },
    secondaryCta: {
      href: "/compare/qr-code-monkey-vs-qr-master",
      label: "See another comparison",
    },
    relatedLinks: [
      {
        href: "/compare/beaconstac-alternative",
        title: "Beaconstac Alternative",
        description: "A stronger enterprise-vs-SMB contrast.",
      },
      {
        href: "/qr-code-for-marketing-campaigns",
        title: "QR Codes for Marketing Campaigns",
        description: "Commercial parent for measurable campaign workflows.",
      },
      {
        href: "/guide/how-to-track-qr-code-scans",
        title: "How to Track QR Code Scans",
        description: "Guide for buyers who still need to validate tracking requirements.",
      },
    ],
  },
  {
    slug: "qr-code-monkey-vs-qr-master",
    title: "QR Code Monkey vs QR Master",
    description:
      "Compare QR Code Monkey vs QR Master for static QR generation, dynamic workflows, analytics, and long-term business use.",
    canonicalPath: "/compare/qr-code-monkey-vs-qr-master",
    targetKeyword: "qr code monkey vs qr master",
    comparisonType: "versus",
    intentStage: "bottom",
    cluster: "comparison",
    primaryEntity: "QR Master",
    secondaryEntity: "QR Code Monkey",
    intro:
      "This comparison matters when the real question is not just who creates a QR code, but who manages it after print.",
    quickAnswer:
      "QR Code Monkey is a strong static QR tool, while QR Master is the better fit when you need dynamic updates, analytics, and business workflows that survive after printing.",
    scorecard: [
      {
        topic: "Static QR creation",
        qrMaster: "Supported",
        alternative: "Strong and widely recognized for static creation",
      },
      {
        topic: "Dynamic QR workflows",
        qrMaster: "Core product strength",
        alternative: "Not the main reason buyers choose it",
      },
      {
        topic: "Analytics and campaign management",
        qrMaster: "Built around measurable QR use",
        alternative: "Limited relative to business workflow needs",
      },
    ],
    decisionPoints: [
      {
        label: "You only need a one-off static QR",
        winner: "alternative",
        reason: "QR Code Monkey is well known for simple static generation.",
      },
      {
        label: "You need post-print edits and scan reporting",
        winner: "qr-master",
        reason: "Those are core product jobs for QR Master.",
      },
      {
        label: "You are printing for campaigns, menus, or packaging",
        winner: "qr-master",
        reason: "The ability to update destinations and track results matters more after printing starts.",
      },
    ],
    bestForQrMaster: [
      "Businesses running printed campaigns",
      "Teams that care about tracking and editable destinations",
      "Users likely to outgrow a one-off static workflow",
    ],
    bestForAlternative: [
      "Users who need a simple static QR and nothing beyond generation",
      "One-time use cases with no analytics or post-print management needs",
    ],
    migrationSteps: [
      "Identify which existing codes need to remain editable after print.",
      "Move those codes first into QR Master's dynamic workflows.",
      "Keep static one-off generation separate from business-managed QR assets.",
    ],
    faq: [
      {
        question: "Is QR Code Monkey enough for business use?",
        answer: "It can be enough for simple static generation, but it is not the best fit when you need dynamic management and analytics.",
      },
      {
        question: "What is the key difference in this comparison?",
        answer: "Static generation vs. dynamic, measurable, and manageable QR workflows.",
      },
      {
        question: "Who should pick QR Master instead?",
        answer: "Anyone printing QR codes for campaigns, menus, packaging, or other assets that may change later.",
      },
    ],
    primaryCta: {
      href: "/dynamic-qr-code-generator",
      label: "Create a dynamic QR",
    },
    secondaryCta: {
      href: "/compare/free-vs-paid-qr-code-generator",
      label: "See free vs paid",
    },
    relatedLinks: [
      {
        href: "/compare/dynamic-vs-static-qr-codes",
        title: "Dynamic vs Static QR Codes",
        description: "Helpful if the buying question is really about editability.",
      },
      {
        href: "/guide/why-my-qr-code-is-not-scanning",
        title: "Why My QR Code Is Not Scanning",
        description: "Problem-solving guide for users diagnosing print and scan issues.",
      },
      {
        href: "/custom-qr-code-generator",
        title: "Custom QR Code Generator",
        description: "Commercial parent for branded QR creation workflows.",
      },
    ],
  },
  {
    slug: "free-vs-paid-qr-code-generator",
    title: "Free vs Paid QR Code Generator",
    description:
      "Understand when a free QR generator is enough and when a paid QR workflow becomes worth it for business, print, and tracking.",
    canonicalPath: "/compare/free-vs-paid-qr-code-generator",
    targetKeyword: "free vs paid qr code generator",
    comparisonType: "model",
    intentStage: "bottom",
    cluster: "comparison",
    primaryEntity: "Free QR generator",
    secondaryEntity: "Paid QR platform",
    intro:
      "Most buyers are not really choosing between two brands here. They are choosing between a one-off static tool and a managed QR workflow.",
    quickAnswer:
      "Free QR generators are enough for one-time static links. Paid QR platforms are worth it when the QR code is printed at scale, tied to campaigns, or needs editing and analytics later.",
    scorecard: [
      {
        topic: "Best use case",
        qrMaster: "Business workflows, dynamic edits, analytics, campaign management",
        alternative: "One-off static QR creation",
      },
      {
        topic: "Risk after print",
        qrMaster: "Lower because destinations can change",
        alternative: "Higher because broken or outdated links require reprint",
      },
      {
        topic: "Measurement",
        qrMaster: "Built for tracking and attribution",
        alternative: "Usually limited or absent",
      },
    ],
    decisionPoints: [
      {
        label: "You will never change the destination",
        winner: "alternative",
        reason: "A free static tool may be enough for a permanent URL.",
      },
      {
        label: "You are printing at scale or running campaigns",
        winner: "qr-master",
        reason: "Editability and analytics become more valuable than the cost difference.",
      },
      {
        label: "You need reporting and ROI context",
        winner: "qr-master",
        reason: "Free tools rarely support business-grade measurement cleanly.",
      },
    ],
    bestForQrMaster: [
      "Marketers with measurable offline campaigns",
      "Restaurants and retail businesses with changing destinations",
      "Teams managing many codes or repeated print runs",
    ],
    bestForAlternative: [
      "Personal one-off QR links",
      "Permanent URLs that are unlikely to change",
    ],
    migrationSteps: [
      "Separate one-time static codes from codes that need future updates.",
      "Move business-critical codes into dynamic management first.",
      "Use QR Master for anything tied to tracking, packaging, menus, or campaigns.",
    ],
    faq: [
      {
        question: "When is free enough?",
        answer: "When the link is permanent, the QR will not be reused in campaigns, and analytics do not matter.",
      },
      {
        question: "When is paid worth it?",
        answer: "When the QR may need editing later, when tracking matters, or when reprinting is expensive.",
      },
      {
        question: "What hidden cost does this comparison miss?",
        answer: "The cost of reprinting static QR assets when the destination changes after distribution.",
      },
    ],
    primaryCta: {
      href: "/pricing",
      label: "See plans",
    },
    secondaryCta: {
      href: "/reprint-calculator",
      label: "Estimate reprint savings",
    },
    relatedLinks: [
      {
        href: "/compare/dynamic-vs-static-qr-codes",
        title: "Dynamic vs Static QR Codes",
        description: "The clearest conceptual companion to free vs paid.",
      },
      {
        href: "/guide/how-to-track-qr-code-scans",
        title: "How to Track QR Code Scans",
        description: "Useful for buyers validating whether analytics changes the purchase decision.",
      },
      {
        href: "/bulk-qr-code-generator",
        title: "Bulk QR Code Generator",
        description: "Commercial page for higher-volume QR workflows.",
      },
    ],
  },
  {
    slug: "dynamic-vs-static-qr-codes",
    title: "Dynamic vs Static QR Codes",
    description:
      "Compare dynamic vs static QR codes for editability, analytics, long-term print use, and business workflows.",
    canonicalPath: "/compare/dynamic-vs-static-qr-codes",
    targetKeyword: "dynamic vs static qr codes",
    comparisonType: "feature",
    intentStage: "middle",
    cluster: "comparison",
    primaryEntity: "Dynamic QR codes",
    secondaryEntity: "Static QR codes",
    intro:
      "This is one of the highest-leverage comparisons in the category because it shapes almost every later buying decision.",
    quickAnswer:
      "Static QR codes are fixed forever. Dynamic QR codes let you change the destination later and track scans, which makes them the better fit for most business and campaign use cases.",
    scorecard: [
      {
        topic: "Editability",
        qrMaster: "Destination can be updated after print",
        alternative: "Destination is permanent once generated",
      },
      {
        topic: "Analytics",
        qrMaster: "Tracking is possible",
        alternative: "Tracking is limited or absent",
      },
      {
        topic: "Best use case",
        qrMaster: "Campaigns, menus, packaging, business workflows",
        alternative: "Permanent one-off links",
      },
    ],
    decisionPoints: [
      {
        label: "The destination might change later",
        winner: "qr-master",
        reason: "Dynamic QR codes exist specifically to absorb that change without reprinting.",
      },
      {
        label: "You only need a permanent URL once",
        winner: "alternative",
        reason: "Static QR codes may be enough for a truly unchanging destination.",
      },
      {
        label: "You want measurement and attribution",
        winner: "qr-master",
        reason: "Dynamic workflows are the better fit for reporting and campaign analysis.",
      },
    ],
    bestForQrMaster: [
      "Campaign and analytics-oriented use cases",
      "Anything printed at scale or reused over time",
      "Teams that want to preserve flexibility after distribution",
    ],
    bestForAlternative: [
      "Permanent homepage links",
      "Simple one-off QR stickers with no analytics requirement",
    ],
    migrationSteps: [
      "Audit which currently static codes are tied to changeable destinations.",
      "Move those codes into dynamic workflows before the next print run.",
      "Keep static only for permanent destinations with low business risk.",
    ],
    faq: [
      {
        question: "Is dynamic always better?",
        answer: "Not always, but dynamic is usually better for business workflows because it protects printed assets from future URL changes.",
      },
      {
        question: "When should I keep a QR static?",
        answer: "When the link is truly permanent and analytics do not matter.",
      },
      {
        question: "Why is this comparison so commercially important?",
        answer: "Because it explains the upgrade path from simple generation to managed QR operations.",
      },
    ],
    primaryCta: {
      href: "/dynamic-qr-code-generator",
      label: "Create a dynamic QR",
    },
    secondaryCta: {
      href: "/guide/how-to-track-qr-code-scans",
      label: "Learn how tracking works",
    },
    relatedLinks: [
      {
        href: "/compare/free-vs-paid-qr-code-generator",
        title: "Free vs Paid QR Generator",
        description: "Companion buying question for users comparing delivery models.",
      },
      {
        href: "/reprint-calculator",
        title: "Reprint Savings Calculator",
        description: "Commercial support page for the cost argument behind dynamic QR codes.",
      },
      {
        href: "/qr-code-tracking",
        title: "QR Code Tracking",
        description: "Commercial feature page connected to dynamic QR value.",
      },
    ],
  },
  {
    slug: "bulk-qr-generator-vs-single-qr-generator",
    title: "Bulk QR Generator vs Single QR Generator",
    description:
      "Understand when bulk QR generation is necessary for packaging, labels, events, and recurring offline workflows.",
    canonicalPath: "/compare/bulk-qr-generator-vs-single-qr-generator",
    targetKeyword: "bulk qr generator vs single qr generator",
    comparisonType: "feature",
    intentStage: "middle",
    cluster: "comparison",
    primaryEntity: "Bulk QR generation",
    secondaryEntity: "Single QR generation",
    intro:
      "This comparison matters when a business is moving from occasional QR creation into repeatable operational volume.",
    quickAnswer:
      "Single QR generation is fine for one-off assets. Bulk QR generation becomes necessary when you manage repeated labels, packaging, events, or SKU-linked workflows at scale.",
    scorecard: [
      {
        topic: "Best fit",
        qrMaster: "Large recurring batches and operational workflows",
        alternative: "One-off marketing assets or simple needs",
      },
      {
        topic: "Throughput",
        qrMaster: "Designed for CSV and spreadsheet-driven creation",
        alternative: "Manual, one code at a time",
      },
      {
        topic: "Operational value",
        qrMaster: "Better for inventory, ticketing, packaging, and label programs",
        alternative: "Better for ad hoc marketing requests",
      },
    ],
    decisionPoints: [
      {
        label: "You are managing repeated QR creation from a spreadsheet",
        winner: "qr-master",
        reason: "Bulk workflows eliminate manual repetition and reduce process risk.",
      },
      {
        label: "You only need a few codes occasionally",
        winner: "alternative",
        reason: "A single-code workflow may be simpler if volume is low.",
      },
      {
        label: "You want scaling headroom before the process breaks",
        winner: "qr-master",
        reason: "Bulk generation becomes the cleaner operational choice earlier than many teams expect.",
      },
    ],
    bestForQrMaster: [
      "Packaging and label programs",
      "Event and ticketing workflows",
      "Recurring campaign and inventory operations",
    ],
    bestForAlternative: [
      "One-off flyer or poster QR requests",
      "Small teams with only occasional QR needs",
    ],
    migrationSteps: [
      "Identify the fields that define each QR record in your spreadsheet.",
      "Normalize the input columns for destination, label, and grouping.",
      "Move the highest-volume workflow into QR Master's bulk system first.",
    ],
    faq: [
      {
        question: "Who actually needs bulk QR generation?",
        answer: "Teams working with packaging, labels, events, recurring campaigns, or anything spreadsheet-driven at volume.",
      },
      {
        question: "Is bulk generation only for enterprises?",
        answer: "No. SMB teams hit the bulk threshold quickly when they move into packaging, event, or SKU workflows.",
      },
      {
        question: "What is the operational advantage of bulk generation?",
        answer: "Speed, consistency, and lower manual error across repeated QR creation tasks.",
      },
    ],
    primaryCta: {
      href: "/bulk-qr-code-generator",
      label: "See bulk workflows",
    },
    secondaryCta: {
      href: "/guide/how-to-track-qr-code-scans",
      label: "See measurement setup",
    },
    relatedLinks: [
      {
        href: "/use-cases/packaging-qr-codes",
        title: "Packaging QR Codes",
        description: "Use-case page for post-purchase and label workflows.",
      },
      {
        href: "/compare/free-vs-paid-qr-code-generator",
        title: "Free vs Paid QR Generator",
        description: "Useful when volume is the real reason a team outgrows free tools.",
      },
      {
        href: "/guide/qr-code-print-size",
        title: "QR Code Print Size",
        description: "Support guide for teams shipping QR assets into physical production.",
      },
    ],
  },
];

export const comparisonPagesMap = Object.fromEntries(
  comparisonPages.map((page) => [page.slug, page]),
);

export function getComparisonPage(slug: string): ComparisonPage | undefined {
  return comparisonPagesMap[slug];
}
